Add solution for 4l
This commit is contained in:
parent
4be2c93c23
commit
00a639c25d
10
exam/ex.tex
10
exam/ex.tex
@ -236,7 +236,15 @@
|
|||||||
for transmission of public keys so that they can fit in commonly used
|
for transmission of public keys so that they can fit in commonly used
|
||||||
packet sizes.
|
packet sizes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\item \TODO
|
\item One disadvantage of the scheme is that it inherently has a non-zero
|
||||||
|
decoding failure rate (DFR). For ephemeral keys and the lowest security
|
||||||
|
level, the authors advertise an error probability of $14$ out of $1.2\cdot
|
||||||
|
10^9$ decodes. The DFR can be lowered by choosing different parameters,
|
||||||
|
but the rate is arguably still too high for practical use.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For long term keys the authors state that 95 out of 100 keys (lowest
|
||||||
|
security level) provide a DFR of $2^{-64}$, which is also arguably too low
|
||||||
|
for extended use well into the future.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{enumerate}
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user