\chapter{Defenses against Tracking}%
\label{chap:defenses against tracking}

The proliferation of tracking across the web has led to the development of a
myriad of tools that each have their own advantages and disadvantages. Some
tracking methods can be easily mitigated by changing browser settings or by
disabling certain technologies. More often than not, these methods not only stop
or limit tracking but also severely hamper the internet experience for end
users. Especially some of the more advanced tools require user input to know
which items to block and which to let through. This in turn requires expertise
that few regular internet users possess, further complicating defending against
tracking. This chapter introduces methods and tools that have been proven to be
effective against tracking on the web. It is split into two parts, with the
first surveying techniques that can be applied to limit tracking and the second
presenting tools to managing tracking on the web. The focus lies on defending
against the methods discussed in chapter~\ref{chap:tracking methods}.

\section{Techniques}
\label{sec:techniques}

The aim of this section is to present comparatively simple techniques that a
user can employ to limit tracking. The benefit of these methods is that they are
built into modern browsers and therefore do not require specific user knowledge
of installing any additional tools. Although their implementations vary from
one browser to another, the basic idea of the underlying functionality remains
the same.

\subsection{Opt-out and Opt-in}
\label{subsec:Opt-out}

To opt-out in the context of web tracking means to make use of the possibility
of turning off data collection by a web site. After the user has opted-out of
either all data collection or only a subset of all the data that a web site
collects, an opt-out cookie is set, indicating the user's preference. Whereas
opting-out generally means that data collection happens by default, opt-in
requires that data collection is turned off by default. In theory it allows
users to have fine-grained control over which aspects of their online presence
they are comfortable with sharing by either opting-out or opting-in (depending
on how web sites ask for consent). In practice however, the seemingly irrelevant
difference between those two lead to very different outcomes with respect to the
amount of users that are tracked.

For either opt-out or opt-in to work, a web site has to provide an option for
doing so. Because web sites increasingly use third parties to manage data
collection on their site, consent or rejection has to be passed to these third
parties and they have to be willing to accept such a decision. Since the
European's \gls{GDPR} came into force in 2018, service providers operating in
the European Union are required to ask users for explicit consent before
collecting any data, except when that data is absolutely necessary to ensure
basic functionality. It is not allowed to notify the user that by continuing to
visit the web site, consent to data collection is given. Furthermore, if consent
is not given, the web site provider is not allowed to block the user from
visiting the web site. Even before the \gls{GDPR}, the EU required web sites to
ask for informed consent via the ePrivacy Directive which came into force in
2013. \citet{trevisanYearsEUCookie2019} use their tool \emph{CookieCheck} to
evaluate how many of the surveyed 35.000 sites comply with the legislation put
forth in the ePrivacy Directive. Their findings indicate that almost half (49\%)
of the web sites use profiling technologies without consent. Similarly,
\citet{sanchez-rolaCanOptOut2019a} show that tracking is still prevalent  and
happens already before user consent is given after the \gls{GDPR} has been in
force for a year. \citet{huCharacterisingThirdParty2019} come to a a similar
conclusion while only looking at third party tracking: the amount of cookies
stored on a user's computer has not changed significantly since before the
\gls{GDPR}. In yet another survey of the top 500 web sites as ranked by Alexa,
\citet{degelingWeValueYour2019} conclude that the amount of tracking before and
after the \gls{GDPR} stayed the same and only 37 sites ask for consent before
storing any cookies.

Giving users a choice whether they want to share their personal information or
not and given that web sites honor such a request, all of the methods discussed
in chapter~\ref{chap:tracking methods} can be defended against.

\subsection{Clearing Browser History}
\label{subsec:Clearing Browser History}

\subsection{Private Browsing Mode}
\label{subsec:Private Browsing Mode}

\subsection{Do Not Track}
\label{subsec:Do Not Track}

\subsection{Privacy-focused Search Engines}
\label{subsec:Privacy-focused Search Engines}

\section{Tools}
\label{sec:tools}

\subsection{Blacklists}
\label{subsec:blacklists}

\subsection{TOR}
\label{subsec:tor}

\subsection{Virtual Private Networks}
\label{subsec:virtual private networks}

\subsection{Privacy Badger}
\label{subsec:privacy badger}

\subsection{Request Policy}
\label{subsec:Request Policy}


