Remove boilerplate instructions
This commit is contained in:
parent
a3f0222a7f
commit
58ea85fc4d
@ -411,31 +411,18 @@ improvements and further research questions.
|
|||||||
\chapter{Theoretical Background}
|
\chapter{Theoretical Background}
|
||||||
\label{chap:background}
|
\label{chap:background}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Describe the contents of this chapter.
|
This chapter is split into five parts. First, we introduce general
|
||||||
|
machine learning concepts (section~\ref{sec:theory-ml}). Second, we
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
provide a survey of object detection methods from early
|
||||||
\item Introduction to Object Detection, short ``history'' of methods,
|
\emph{traditional methods} to one-stage and two-stage deep learning
|
||||||
region-based vs. single-shot, YOLOv7 structure and successive
|
based methods (section~\ref{sec:background-detection}). Third, we go
|
||||||
improvements of previous versions. (8 pages)
|
into detail about image classification in general and which approaches
|
||||||
\item Introduction to Image Classification, short ``history'' of
|
have been published in the literature
|
||||||
methods, CNNs, problems with deeper network structures (vanishing
|
(section~\ref{sec:background-classification}). Fourth, we give a short
|
||||||
gradients, computational cost), methods to alleviate these problems
|
explanation of transfer learning and its advantages and disadvantages
|
||||||
(alternative activation functions, normalization, residual
|
(section~\ref{sec:background-transfer-learning}). The chapter
|
||||||
connections, different kernel sizes). (10 pages)
|
concludes with a section on hyperparameter optimization
|
||||||
\item Introduction into transfer learning, why do it and how can one
|
(section~\ref{sec:background-hypopt}).
|
||||||
do it? Compare fine-tuning just the last layers vs. fine-tuning all
|
|
||||||
of them. What are the advantages/disadvantages of transfer learning?
|
|
||||||
(2 pages)
|
|
||||||
\item Introduction to hyperparameter optimization. Which methods exist
|
|
||||||
and what are their advantages/disadvantages? Discuss the ones used
|
|
||||||
in this thesis in detail (random search and evolutionary
|
|
||||||
optimization). (3 pages)
|
|
||||||
\item Related Work. Add more approaches and cross-reference the used
|
|
||||||
networks with the theoretical sections on object detection and image
|
|
||||||
classification. (6 pages)
|
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Estimated 25 pages for this chapter.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Machine Learning}
|
\section{Machine Learning}
|
||||||
\label{sec:theory-ml}
|
\label{sec:theory-ml}
|
||||||
@ -1260,21 +1247,6 @@ at a speed of around \qty{11}{fp\s} on the \gls{coco} data set.
|
|||||||
\section{Image Classification}
|
\section{Image Classification}
|
||||||
\label{sec:background-classification}
|
\label{sec:background-classification}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Give a definition of image classification and briefly mention the way
|
|
||||||
in which classification was done before the advent of CNNs. Introduce
|
|
||||||
CNNs, their overall design, and why a kernel-based approach allows
|
|
||||||
two-dimensional data such as images to be efficiently processed. Give
|
|
||||||
an introduction to SOTA classifiers before ResNet (AlexNet, VGGnet
|
|
||||||
Inception/GoogLeNet), the prevailing opinion of \emph{going deeper}
|
|
||||||
(stacking more layers) and the limit of said approach
|
|
||||||
(\emph{Degradation Problem}) due to \emph{Vanishing
|
|
||||||
Gradients}. Explain ways to deal with the vanishing gradients problem
|
|
||||||
by using different activation functions other than Sigmoid (ReLU and
|
|
||||||
leaky ReLU) as well as normalization techniques and residual
|
|
||||||
connections.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Estimated 8 pages for this section.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Image classification, in contrast to object detection, is a slightly
|
Image classification, in contrast to object detection, is a slightly
|
||||||
easier task because there is no requirement to localize objects in the
|
easier task because there is no requirement to localize objects in the
|
||||||
image. Instead, image classification operates always on the image as a
|
image. Instead, image classification operates always on the image as a
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user