From 2f16a064f43868ae7586dfbf4e6176dca2ad416f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tobias Eidelpes Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 12:12:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Rectify wording issue in Limit Monotonicity --- paper/termpaper.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/paper/termpaper.tex b/paper/termpaper.tex index 988e8a6..91ef1ba 100644 --- a/paper/termpaper.tex +++ b/paper/termpaper.tex @@ -408,8 +408,8 @@ for selection, which is not the case when the satisfaction function $sat_\$$ relation of a project's cost to the budget limit is modified. Whereas discount monotonicity changes the project's cost, limit monotonicity changes the total available budget. It states that if the budget limit is increased and there -exists no project which costs exactly the amount to which the budget was -increased, then a project that was a winning project before will still be one +exists no project which might become affordable and give higher satisfaction +than the previous solution, then a project that was a winning project before will still be one after the budget is increased. Not satisfying this axiom could provoke discontent among the voters when they realize that their approved project is not funded anymore because the total budget has increased, as this is somewhat