54 lines
1.9 KiB
TeX

\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{csquotes}
\begin{document}
\section{Summary}
\label{sec:Summary}
The paper first gives a short introduction to the history of QBF solvers and
their relation to SAT solvers. The general structure of the paper is introduced.
A section about defining the terms used throughout the paper follows and the
complexity of these types of problems is mentioned. The Couterexample-Guided
Abstraction Refinement (CEGAR) technique for solving QBFs is defined and the
principle is demonstrated by using pseudocode. The fourth, and main, section of
the paper discusses different applications for QBFs and the content of the paper
is summarized in the conclusion.
\section{Evaluation}
\label{sec:Evaluation}
\section{Overall impression}
\label{sec:Overall impression}
Overall I think your paper provides a good overview of quantified boolean
formulae.
\section{Language}
\label{sec:Language}
The language used throughout the paper is in general suitable for scientific
writing with respect to the used vocabulary. There are some grammatical and
spelling errors. Most notably indefinite articles that are missing or wrong
(e.g., page 5 in the section \emph{Planning}: \enquote{A existence...}). Some
sentences are grammatically incorrect or are hard to read due to their
structure. The sentence on the bottom of page 3 and the beginning of page 4 is
an example of this. Scientific writing normally does not use abbreviations such
as \emph{doesn't} or \emph{we're}. There is also one sentence at the end of
section 4.3.1 which is started with \enquote{Another} but never finished.
\section{Layout}
\label{sec:Layout}
It seems that the course template has been used, although the title page has
been changed to be on a single page and a table of contents is included. The
introductory slides of this course states that
\end{document}