zenon/trustworthy-ai
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Use non without hyphen

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Tobias Eidelpes 2021-12-16 10:46:20 +01:00
parent e6c9617a36
commit 315ce6ad4b
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
trustworthy-ai.tex
View File

@ -108,14 +108,14 @@ the former in the case of a poorly trained machine learning algorithm that
simply classifies pictures of dogs and cats always as dogs, for example.
Scholars usually divide trust either into \emph{cognitive} or
\emph{non-cognitive} forms. While cognitive trust involves some sort of rational
and objective evaluation of the trustee's capabilities, non-cognitive trust
\emph{noncognitive} forms. While cognitive trust involves some sort of rational
and objective evaluation of the trustee's capabilities, noncognitive trust
lacks such an evaluation. For instance, if a patient comes to a doctor with a
health problem which resides in the doctor's domain, the patient will place
trust in the doctor because of the doctor's experience, track record and
education. The patient thus consciously decides that he/she would rather trust
the doctor to solve the problem and not a friend who does not have any
expertise. Conversely, non-cognitive trust allows humans to place trust in
expertise. Conversely, noncognitive trust allows humans to place trust in
people they know well, without a need for rational justification, but just
because of their existing relationship.
@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ of the triple
performed by the agent $Y$ to achieve goal $G$. $C$ stands for the context in
which the action takes place.
\subsubsection{Simple Trust} is a non-cognitive form of trust and the least
\subsubsection{Simple Trust} is a noncognitive form of trust and the least
demanding form of trust in the incremental model. $X$ trusts $Y$ to perform an
action $A$ to pursue the goal $G$ without requiring additional information about
$Y$'s ability to generate a satisfactory outcome. In other words, $X$
@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ reasons.
model proposed by \cite{ferrario_ai_2020}. In addition to having objective
reasons to trust $Y$, $X$ is also willing to do so without control. It is thus a
combination of simple trust and reflective trust. Simple trust provides the
non-cognitive, non-controlling aspect of trust and reflective trust provides the
noncognitive, noncontrolling aspect of trust and reflective trust provides the
cognitive aspect.
\subsection{Application of the Model}