diff --git a/trustworthy-ai.tex b/trustworthy-ai.tex
index 02893e5..8b19ee6 100644
--- a/trustworthy-ai.tex
+++ b/trustworthy-ai.tex
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ transformative capabilities of AI are not just felt in the area of computer
 science, but have bled into a diverse set of other disciplines such as biology,
 chemistry, mathematics and economics. For the purposes of this work, AIs are
 machines that can learn, take decision autonomously and interact with the
-environment~\cite{russell_artificial_2021}.
+environment~\cite{russellArtificialIntelligenceModern2021}.
 
 While the possibilities of AI are seemingly endless, the public is slowly but
 steadily learning about its limitations. These limitations manifest themselves
@@ -121,14 +121,14 @@ because of their existing relationship.
 
 Due to the different dimensions of trust and its inherent complexity in
 different contexts, frameworks for trust are an active field of research. One
-such framework—proposed by \textcite{ferrario_ai_2020}—will be discussed in
+such framework—proposed by \textcite{ferrarioAIWeTrust2020}—will be discussed in
 the following sections.
 
 \subsection{Incremental Model of Trust}
 
-The framework by \textcite{ferrario_ai_2020} consists of three types of trust:
-simple trust, reflective trust and paradigmatic trust. Their model thus consists
-of the triple 
+The framework by \textcite{ferrarioAIWeTrust2020} consists of three types of
+trust: simple trust, reflective trust and paradigmatic trust. Their model thus
+consists of the triple 
 
 \[ T = \langle\text{simple trust}, \text{reflective trust}, \text{paradigmatic
     trust}\rangle \]
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ trust $Y$ to perform a given task because of other, potentially unconscious,
 reasons. 
 
 \subsubsection{Pragmatic Trust} is the last form of trust in the incremental
-model proposed by \cite{ferrario_ai_2020}. In addition to having objective
+model proposed by \cite{ferrarioAIWeTrust2020}. In addition to having objective
 reasons to trust $Y$, $X$ is also willing to do so without control. It is thus a
 combination of simple trust and reflective trust. Simple trust provides the
 non-cognitive, non-controlling aspect of trust and reflective trust provides the